Will the Next World Food Programme Chief Answer to Trump?
Sam Vigersky
The New Humanitarian 3 March 2026
Summary: Following Cindy McCain's resignation as WFP Executive Director after a stroke, the UN Secretary-General is expected to fill the vacancy with a US-nominated candidate — handing President Trump significant leverage over the world's largest humanitarian aid agency.
WFP has already lost $2.6 billion in US funding following the closure of USAID, eliminated nearly 6,000 jobs, and faces further instability from a new US policy channelling all UN humanitarian funding through OCHA rather than directly to agencies like WFP, UNICEF, and UNHCR.
The human cost is already visible: three out of four acutely malnourished children in Afghanistan are being turned away for treatment, and WFP's emergency food reach in Somalia has collapsed from 2.2 million people to 600,000.
The author argues that the critical question is whether Trump's eventual appointee will uphold WFP's principled humanitarian mission or subordinate it to US foreign policy interests.
Quotes: "Humanitarian aid is no longer billed as a needs-based charity, but an explicit lever of statecraft." / "Will the next WFP chief answer to Washington, or to a principled humanitarian calling?"
Comments
Post a Comment
If you are a member of XUNICEF, you can comment directly on a post. Or, send your comments to us at xunicef.news.views@gmail.com and we will publish them for you.