Skip to main content

If You Love Your Next of Kin, Don’t Die in Spain: Thomas Ekvall

I had always understood that bureaucracy in Spain could be, shall we say, a bit elaborate. Not inefficient, just fond of its own company. That is why an entire cadre of professionals exists here: the “fixers.” Mine is of Indian origin, arrived as a teenager, and never left. He now spends his days helping well-heeled Spaniards navigate their own administration, which they prefer not to engage with themselves. Even the natives, it seems, approach their bureaucracy the way one approaches a bull: with caution, respect, and ideally having someone else standing in front.

My fixer is excellent. Calm, resourceful, and usually able to arrange anything. Which is why I became concerned when he began to look reflective. This happened when I started dealing with the inheritance of my beloved late wife. It was not a complicated case. We had a joint bank account. We owned our apartment fifty-fifty. Our will was beautifully symmetrical: if I died, everything would go to Linda; if she died, everything would go to me. Elegant and logical in its simplicity.

Spain, however, prefers a more baroque approach.

To begin with, I was asked to provide the balance of our bank account on the date of my wife’s passing for inheritance tax purposes. Fair enough. I naively assumed the bank might simply tell me. Instead, they gave me a ten-page document titled, with admirable understatement, “Guide for Processing the Inheritance of the Bank’s Products.” “Products,” in this case, are the money in our account.

Step one: Attend a meeting at the bank to have the process explained. Step two through six: produce a series of documents, each of which appears to require a subset of other documents. Among these is our marriage certificate.

We were married nearly fifty years ago in Ethiopia. This, it turns out, raises concerns. The certificate was deemed “too old,” which struck me as an unusual criticism of a long marriage. I gently suggested that if one marries fifty years ago, the certificate tends to follow suit. This was not received as the breakthrough in administrative philosophy I had hoped for.

What was needed, I was told, was an “international marriage certificate.” Sweden, my home country, does not issue such things. They did, however, offer me a document confirming that I am, indeed, married to Linda, available in Swedish or English. Two languages that, in this context, possess the administrative value of calligraphy.

One helpful official suggested I might return to Addis Ababa to obtain confirmation that my marriage certificate, after half a century, remains valid, and that the Spanish embassy there might assist in translating it into Spanish. At this point, I had learned that irony is not a recognised administrative language, so I simply kept quiet.

And this is just one document.

There are many others, each with its own internal logic, obtainable elsewhere, in person, on alternate Tuesdays, possibly before noon, and accompanied by a photocopy of something not yet requested. The process has a certain philosophical purity: no single requirement is impossible, but the totality comes very close.

I have also discovered that information is generously available. Ask three officials the same question, and you will receive three different answers, all delivered with confidence, and all mutually exclusive. It is less a system than an ongoing conversation without a conclusion.

One begins to understand certain features of Spanish society. For instance, the remarkable density of law firms. In other countries, lawyers are consulted when something has gone wrong. In Spain, they are consulted as a precaution, much like one might carry insurance.

And one cannot help but wonder: who benefits from all this? The civil service is a model of institutional job creation. The legal profession, without question. The fixers, who operate like seasoned guides through a dense jungle. And perhaps the banks. One imagines a mountain of unclaimed inheritances, accruing interest while their rightful owners assemble documentation from multiple continents.

To be fair, obtaining documents from Sweden is relatively straightforward; most things can be downloaded at the click of a mouse. But if you happen to come from a country where records are not digitised, not centralised, or not easily accessible, then this process ceases to be cumbersome and becomes, quite simply, prohibitive.

Which is where the humour fades. Beneath the absurdity lies something less amusing: a system so complex that it risks excluding the very people it is meant to serve.

Still, one must keep perspective. Spain offers sunshine, beauty, warmth, and, in its administrative practices, a powerful incentive to remain alive. That may well be reflected in the country’s very high life expectancy.

Comments

  1. Spain has one lawyer per 300 people, and Sweden has 1,500 people per lawyer.

    ReplyDelete
  2. My kids have lived and worked in 3 countries in Europe as American adults - only in Spain was it soo complex and bureaucratic that we needed a lawyer to figure out how to apply for temporary residency- anything list of papers and stamps needed for each step.

    ReplyDelete
  3. When my granddaughter told me she chose Legal Spanish as a course at Yale , I was puzzled. After reading this article , I understand its relevance.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thomas: What a simpatico description of the Spanish Bureaucracy – but if you had lived in Iran before the Revolution, a completely different set of rules applied. It wasn’t anything to do with the forms required, it was how much you had to provide the ‘fonctionnaire’. Too little, and you were given a day and time on which to return to make re-application which usually was set as far into the future as your original offer was below their expectation. And this was even before there was a death to consider.

    Today, I live in the UK where a coroner guides one in the ‘necessities’ following a death. When a brother of mine died, his two sons were out of the country at the time so it was left to me to present the coroner with what was required, which included the need to have no fewer than 7 death certificates, which I thought was a bit excessive. The hospital where he died confirmed that he was, actually, fully dead. Wasn’t that enough ? Apparently not. The bank needed to know it - in writing; the tax-authorities wanted two of them – both in writing, too (in case they mislaid one ?); and so it went on and on. After this experience, I asked my remaining brothers please to outlive me so they could experience the coroner’s wishes as part of their own bucket-list items. Once was enough for me.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Please ensure you leave your name, bei either selecting your google account (if you have one), or selecting 'name' from the drop down menu. Enter your name there. If confused, leave your name in the text of your comment.
You can also copy and paste: 👍