Skip to main content

From the Frontlines in Iraq, by Zaid Jurji

How We Built a Monitoring & Evaluation System That Passed a UN Security Council Audit

In 1993, almost 33 years ago, I joined UNICEF Iraq as a young professional responsible for the Water and Sanitation program. I stepped into a country devastated by the first Gulf War, where the economy was at its lowest point.

At that moment, UNICEF was undergoing a massive transformation. The office grew from a small technical office of fewer than 10 people into a full-fledged emergency operation managing millions of dollars and employing over 200 staff. I was lucky to get the job. I made a strong case for my motivation and suitability and was selected after a highly competitive process. But honestly, when I started, I had no clue what the UN or UNICEF mandate actually was. I only read the job title and thought my educational background seemed like a good fit.

I quickly learned that our program was a massive supply operation. We were procuring spare parts and equipment to partially repair Iraq’s devastated, but highly sophisticated, urban water systems. These weren't simple wells; they were complex systems involving treatment facilities, pumping, and distribution to millions of people.

The Problem No One Had Yet Solved - Donors who generously funded us always had a simple question: How was our money spent, and what did it achieve? They needed to report back to taxpayers. We were distributing supplies to project sites, but we lacked a proper system to track the rationale behind our decisions or the impact of the work.

I realized that sooner or later, we would need a logical framework to account for the needs and defend why we chose Project A over Project B.

The Solution: Building from Scratch - I started thinking about how we could capture data from the field in a structured way. Over about six months, I developed the initial architecture for two critical systems:
1. A Needs Database: We began collecting and categorizing field data so that, the moment funding was available, we could generate precise lists of required supplies.
2. An Impact Assessment System: Because supplies varied wildly in cost and functionality, we needed to systematically measure the impact of every piece of equipment on the broader system it served.

The Ultimate Test: The Oil-for-Food Programme - Three years into my role, discussions began regarding the infamous Oil-for-Food Programme. Iraq was allowed to sell oil under strict UN oversight, with funds held in an escrow account managed by the UN.

When the Iraqi water authorities began procuring supplies with these funds, I was ready. Using the database I had built, rooted in actual field data, I helped them compile their supply lists with confidence and precision.

Trust is the hardest currency to earn in international development, especially in a context as sensitive as Iraq during the sanctions era. I was representing a UN agency sent to assist, yet the country was simultaneously suffering under UN sanctions. Convincing local authorities to rely on our data required navigating a landscape of deep skepticism. It took time to demonstrate that our goal was purely cooperative. I’m proud to say that by the end of my tenure, we had built the confidence necessary for them to utilize our joint findings effectively.

But the real challenge was yet to come. With massive imports on the horizon, UNICEF was mandated to oversee the entire water and sanitation sector within this program. We faced a logistical nightmare: tracking contracts, navigating a UN Sanctions Committee for approvals, and monitoring shipments from ports of entry to central warehouses, then to sub-national warehouses, and finally to the facilities where they would be installed.

The Result: An "Exemplary" Tracking System  - With the help of a local programming company, I built a comprehensive tracking database to manage this entire lifecycle.

When experts from the UN Security Council and the UN Secretariat arrived to evaluate the program's impact, they reviewed our system. Their conclusion? They deemed the water and sanitation tracking facility “exemplary.”

It provided a transparent window into the movement of supplies, ensuring that monitoring was clear and, most importantly, that the Iraqi people were served equitably.

Reflecting on the Journey:  Looking back, I realize that my foundational skills; intuition, organization, and foresight, helped me get my foot in the door. But it was the ability to identify a gap in accountability and build the systems to fill it that defined my contribution.

In a complex operational environment, data isn't just about reporting; it's about integrity, fairness and equity. It is about defending the decisions that impact millions of lives.

Comments

  1. Thank you, Zaid, for sharing this thoughtful account. Building a practical system amid the pressures of an emergency operation was a substantial achievement. I particularly appreciated your emphasis on earning the trust of Iraqi counterparts and working with local expertise. Your account is a valuable reminder that accountability depends on people who recognise a problem and take the initiative to solve it. A contribution well worth remembering.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you so much Thomas for your generous note. It means a great deal coming from you, a person who whose intelligence, charisma, and leadership I’ve always admired. Much of what I learned about earning trust and taking initiative, I learned from watching you. I’m truly glad the account resonated. Warm regards.

      Delete
    2. Thank you, Zaid. That is very kind and a lot more generous than deserved! Before we lay the foundations for yet another mutual admiration society, let us leave it at this: you did good work in difficult circumstances, and I was pleased to acknowledge it. Cheers, Thomas.

      Delete
  2. Sincere thanks, Zaid, for sharing this excellent article. It captures that period in Iraq with striking clarity. I was also new to UNICEF then, yet the monitoring system you developed stayed with me throughout my 22 plus years in the organization. It was a lasting reminder of the value of strong, evidence based systems and of UNICEF’s ability to uphold the UN principles of humanity, impartiality, neutrality and independence.
    This work set a benchmark for accountability and integrity, strengthening donor trust during a highly sensitive political time and demonstrating UNICEF’s capacity to operate with transparency and rigor. The comprehensive tracking database that was built became a cornerstone of UNICEF’s oversight of the water and sanitation sector under the Oil for Food Programme, enabling effective management in an exceptionally complex environment.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Ghada Kachachi, for your kind words. My work with UNICEF Iraq remains one of the best assignments I have ever had. It was unique in its boundary conditions; the emergency was not created by a natural disaster or a war, but by sanctions, and every day brought new challenges.

      What also mattered was that we had excellent colleagues to learn from, true leaders, who not only had vision but backed their staff, who themselves had the vision to develop and give more. We enjoyed working with people who gave us the liberty to excel when they saw the potential. True leadership qualities were genuinely factored into the recruitment of heads of offices, and that made all the difference.

      Delete
    2. Absolutely! We were fortunate to have the very best leadership—visionary leaders who trusted us and gave us the freedom to excel, which made all the difference.

      Delete
  3. THIS SENTENCE SHOULD BE WRITTEN IN GOLD
    Trust is the hardest currency to earn in international development,

    ReplyDelete
  4. At that time, earning the Iraqi government’s trust was extremely difficult. UNICEF was caught between UN-imposed sanctions, on the one hand, and delivering aid to children, on the other, all while trying to remain true to its identity as an organization with a soul.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I started in Dohuk with WASH team in 1992. At that time there was no system in place. I had conducted and assessment of the WASH needs in the governorate when I was with an INGO and handed it over to UNHCR and UNICEF - and then ended up joining UNICEF and handing that report to myself. I had worked closely with the water department of Dohuk and the INGOs to complete the inventory of what was needed in case any funds came in. We would get abrupt requests from Baghdad with short deadlines as to what we would discuss if we had 1 million of 5 million USD. It was still evolving when I left so we could be better prepared when asked. I was proud to have worked with the water department and NGOs to become a team of peers that had a common assessment of need, a common framework to monitoring WASH projects underway, and placing peer pressure on each other to conduct joint field missions to monitor and report back. We all had to react quickly without much guidance. Thanks for all the work you did.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thankyou for sharing this experience in the ever-important accountability, Zaid. (Rozanne)

    ReplyDelete
  7. Thanks Rozanne and Rob for your kind words.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Please ensure you leave your name, bei either selecting your google account (if you have one), or selecting 'name' from the drop down menu. Enter your name there. If confused, leave your name in the text of your comment.