How Cigna Saves Millions by Having Its Doctors Reject Claims Without Reading Them — Patrick Rucker / ProPublica / Sharif Alam
We are having off and on problems with Cigna’s outfit in Kualalumpur, Malaysia with respect to settlement of invoices, primarily due to managerial/staff incompetence as well as cavalier attitude in the claim department. But what is happening at a much higher level of Cigna is incomprehensible.
This is an agency that UN has contracted as a custodian of active staff/retirees healthcare/welfare. If what the article unearthed is true, UN definitely has a case to defend!
Wonder if high ups in UN responsible for contract management is aware of these revelations!!! If not, shouldn’t we bring it to their attention??
Hope you find a way to bring to their attention!! It’s time Cigna is held to account for their alleged unethical practices!
Sharif Alam
How Cigna Saves Millions by Having Its Doctors Reject Claims Without Reading Them
This article is part of ProPublica's 'Uncovered' SeriesHow the Insurance Industry Denies Coverage to Patients
Please click here to read the full article on ProPublica"The company has built a system that allows its doctors to instantly reject a claim on medical grounds without opening the patient file, leaving people with unexpected bills, according to corporate documents and interviews with former Cigna officials. Over a period of two months last year, Cigna doctors denied over 300,000 requests for payments using this method, spending an average of 1.2 seconds on each case, the documents show. The company has reported it covers or administers health care plans for 18 million people."
"In a written response, Cigna said the reporting by ProPublica and The Capitol Forum was “biased and incomplete.”
Cigna said its review system was created to “accelerate payment of claims for certain routine screenings,” Cigna wrote. “This allows us to automatically approve claims when they are submitted with correct diagnosis codes.”
When asked if its review process, known as PXDX, lets Cigna doctors reject claims without examining them, the company said that description was “incorrect.” It repeatedly declined to answer further questions or provide additional details. (ProPublica employees’ health insurance is provided by Cigna.)"
"Cigna emphasized that its system does not prevent a patient from receiving care — it only decides when the insurer won’t pay. “Reviews occur after the service has been provided to the patient and does not result in any denials of care,” the statement said.
"Our company is committed to improving health outcomes, driving value for our clients and customers, and supporting our team of highly-skilled Medical Directors,” the company said."
Members who are insured by CIGNA may want to write to the UN Health and Life Insurance Section for clarification or to express concern. The email address is hlis@un.org
ReplyDeleteSince Van Breda was bought by CIGNA I found that transactions did take longer and were not as efficient. The move by CIGNA to centralize all Americas regions transactions in Miami was also not very effective in the beginning, but improved over time. Their constant pressure to "do everything on-line" was a bit annoying earlier, but I decided to continue sending in claims by POST and it seems to be OK for the time being, although it is admittedly a bit slower.
ReplyDeleteOtherwise we do not seem to have major issues with our claims.
I don't know if being in Europe makes a difference but I have to say that in almost 14 years of ASHI coverage by CIGNA (previously Van Breda) I have never had any problems with claims or with pre-approval for treatment. I do everything on line now and claims for reimbursement are usually settled promptly.
ReplyDeleteI wrote the below mail to UN HLI. Please see their response below:
ReplyDeleteDear Madam/Sir
I am sharif alam, a unicef retiree. Yesterday while surfing news items on internet, the below article caught my attention. Took time to go through the entire article. It’s alarming, the way it has been depicted.
Cigna has been designated by UN HLI section as the custodian of worldwide (except USA) active staff/retirees healthcare/welfare. Such revelation, if true, is scary and doesn’t give much comfort to thousands of retirees who are dependent on Cigna for timely and prudent settlement of their claims.
As retirees what are our recourse mechanism, if any, if Cigna unilaterally chooses to discard our claims the way the author describes in the below article. Does UN HLI section have any say to a situation where a stalemate arises?
A word from your will definitely boost our comfort levels.
I have shared the same article with Cigna without prejudice yesterday to bring it to their attention. And I am doing the same with you.
Look forward to hearing from you.
Regards.
Sharif Alam, Unicef retiree,
Response:
Dear Sir,
Thank you very much for sharing the email.
I will share with our managers.
Best,
HLIS/ASHI TEAM
Ever since the Asia Processing centre of CIGNA was shifted to Kuala Lumpur, we have faced the extreme bureaucracy of the claims section... the rigamarole of back and forth correspondence even for small amounts is exasperating. My modest reimbursement for COVID related medication, diagnostic tests and doctor's visits amounting to less than US$2000 was cleared after four months, reason for delay was that all COVID claims were sent to Nairobi... no explanation whatsoever, why? Being in India, we are able to access the best quality care for almost 25% of costs of USA, yet the CIGNA office is relentless in chasing up pensioners for discrepancies of small amounts of US $5 (five dollars) so one just gives up.. and I do not think our reimbursements (my husband's and mine) has exceeded 25% of what we are eligible.
ReplyDeletehopefully the digital submissions will make a difference..