Skip to main content

Seeking Meaning When Speaking UN-ese : AP


SDG, ECOSOC, P5+1: Seeking meaning in the UN's coded lingo



The Sec-Gen. Perm Reps. The SDGs. ECOSOC, UNDP, OCHA. Stockholm+50.

Welcome to UNGA.

The United Nations, like many large institutions, has its own language. For the dignitaries, bureaucrats, journalists and officials who walk these halls regularly, this alphanumeric soup has meaning and perhaps even facilitates communication.

But during the handful of days every year when scores of world leaders descend on the U.N. campus in New York, so, too, do many people unfamiliar with these semantic shortcuts.

One organizational chart of the U.N. system lists more than 70 acronyms, from DESA to WFP. The Group of 77 confusingly has 134 members — a contradiction explained on its website as a choice meant to honor the “historical significance” of the original name.

To visitors, it can sometimes seem that language is being used to obscure meaning rather than elucidate it.

Those visitors must go uptown to go back down in order to access the U.N. tower on the East River during the U.N. General Assembly’s high-level debate because of the security cordon. The rhetoric inside is often just as circuitous.

And it’s not just the acronyms for U.N. agencies or nicknames for bodies or meetings. Here, too, appear words rarely heard elsewhere — multilateralism, hegemony, solidarity. Sometimes, they’re strung together in ways that defy attempts at parsing.

North Korea’s representative, for instance, railed against the United States by accusing Washington of trying “to maintain world hegemony by expanding the bilateral and multilateral military alliance system.”

It’s easy to get frustrated, since the words are really all we have this week. Around the world, the United Nations does many significant things: delivering food, administering vaccines, registering refugees. But as leaders make their cases on the world stage, this week is about talk.

Set against this morass, the moments of light, when they come, tend to shine brighter.

The prime minister of St. Vincent and the Grenadines spoke particularly eloquently and powerfully.

Ukraine’s president made an impassioned plea for punishing Russia for its invasion, while also vowing Kyiv would prevail.

And Bhutan’s foreign minister tugged at heartstrings, reading a letter from a 7-year-old who feared swelling glacier lakes would flood her Himalayan village and implored world leaders to combat climate change.

In fact, Tandi Dorji said he rethought his speech when he received that note — perhaps a sign that the right words still have power. At least, when it comes to UNGA.

Comments

  1. At least UNICEF is, on its Transparency Portal, bringing light into darkness. Click here to see a list of more than 700 abbreviations apparently common in UNICEF reports. Now you know that the ACMO is OoO, because he is engaging in HWWS to test its potential for MBS, as a contribution to WSUP and inclusion into the next MSDCF. DASEWU!

    ReplyDelete
  2. My take on these things is that there are always acronymns that are part of the internal economy of organizations, as a shorthand and all profesions have them. Where I feel that the damage is done is in our outreach language. Even the SDGS, we feel that they are universally known, and in the main they are right about the whole raft, however, in 2018, I did a very small survey of our national press corps and participants from what may be called green, emergent energy industries, there was a high response in terms of knowledge of the term but asked how relevant it was both media and indsutry actors, responded: good for PR etc but not so much as guideposts to manage emergent industries. I think the SG has been good on Climate Action and with growing evidence of its impact, even in the U.S, denial is difficult. Also, the need to see the U.N front and centre in managing global crisis, the recent grain exports from the Ukraine -- far from perfect but still useful -- brokered in part by the SG is so good. Also, time for the UN Justice system to prosecute only folks from the global south -- with the exception of Serbia, otherwise there is a perception that the global justice system cannot reach other authors of catastrophic genocides. In closing, internal short hand fine but must ensure that in communicting outwards, these are more sparingly used. Best...Samphe

    Interesting to see the IMF call out the Govt of the UKS latest voodoo economics move..whats sauce for the goose...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

If you are a member of XUNICEF, you can comment directly on a post. Or, send your comments to us at xunicef.news.views@gmail.com and we will publish them for you.