When we talk about the good old times in UNICEF, or the golden days of UNICEF, we tend to take the inside view. For example:
But we really should be taking the outside view.
And the answer by UNICEF, in almost all cases, is that UNICEF needs more money. We no longer return the question: “Sir, Excellency, Mr. Head of State, Mr. Minister, son of the gun, what are YOU doing ensure the rights and welfare of your children?”
- In those days, a clear vision was generating commitment among our staff. We were united in purpose. Now, we are pulled into all directions.
- In those days, we were doing things. Now UNICEF staff members suffocate in bureaucracy and write reports that nobody reads.
- In those days, we had to be creative as our resources were limited. Now, we are creatively spending money that otherwise will expire.
- In those days, we wanted to work in the field. Now, everyone seems to work in headquarters.
But we really should be taking the outside view.
- In the days that I do remember, UNICEF was putting children on the agenda of heads of states, governments, and donors. Our Executive Director was staring down war lords. We moved them to take better decisions. UNICEF was driving development.
- Today, UNICEF is cleaning up the mess caused by the lack of concern among heads of state, self-interest of the new elite, lack of attention to children by those in power, and by failed states and their buddies.
And the answer by UNICEF, in almost all cases, is that UNICEF needs more money. We no longer return the question: “Sir, Excellency, Mr. Head of State, Mr. Minister, son of the gun, what are YOU doing ensure the rights and welfare of your children?”
Well said, Detlef! We can only hope that with new leadership UNICEF will start moving to positively impact the lives and well-being of children.
ReplyDeleteDetlef, not sure if my comment in an inside or outside view... in those days, we were out in the field seeing for ourselves and learning first hand, the situation of children and our assisted programmes.. we used such information for advocacy, while preparing the country programmes of cooperation and in the review of reports of government agencies.. also to be effective in our interventions at government meetings at all levels. This was considered our strength in those days in India.
ReplyDelete