![]() |
| October 1, 1960 British and Nigerian Officials at ceremonies marking Indiepence of Nigeria |
In October 1966 northern troops began to cut off food supplies to southeastern Nigeria and by March 1967 the military authorities began a formal blockade of all movement of food and supplies to the region. Given that the population of the small region had swollen by the influx of at least a million refugees, the import restrictions had an immediate effect. A Nigerian representative at the UN defended the blockade by arguing that “starvation is a legitimate weapon of war.” He went on to say, “If children must die first, then that is too bad, just too bad.”
![]() |
| The Shrinking of Biafra - 1967 to 1969 ©Pinterest |
In response, on 30 May 1967 Biafra declared its independence from Nigeria. The early phases of the war in Biafra went largely without notice in the world press. There were much bigger stories capturing headlines. Just a few days after Biafra’s declaration of independence, the 1967 Arab Israeli War began. Public attention in the US was on American troops in Vietnam who were suffering rapidly growing numbers of casualties. In the US protests against the war were growing. As 1968 began, the Biafran war intensified, but world attention again had other events on its mind, including the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia and the Tet offensive in Vietnam.
With so many competing stories in the news, a small break-away state in west Africa attracted little attention from the public or their governments. The exception was the former colonial power, Britain, where authorities quickly pushed back against a breakup of Nigeria, in large part because of the potential loss of the rich oil fields controlled by BP / Shell - a company in which the British Government owned a major stake.
British authorities also had another argument - one that sounded better in public. Africa, it was said, was composed of many ‘Nigerias’ - former European colonies formed for the economic convenience of the colonial powers across many ethnic, cultural and linguistic lines. To permit the breakup of one such new state would lead to the breakup of many others - an often repeated cry heard later in Sudan, Ethiopia, Somalia and other countries facing division.
1967 Ex. Board - L/R Henry Labouisse, Joseph Willard (Chairman),
Jack Charnow, (Secretary), Vedast Kyaruzi (UNICEF Director for Africa south of the Sahara).
The Biafran war posed a crucial moment in post-WWII history. What was the fate of post-colonial states? Would they fall back to their pre-colonial ethnic, tribal, and linguistic groupings? Would they be swept up in the Cold War competition for influence and power? What role should or could a United Nations or other international body play in responding to a civil war within a sovereign country? Was there a responsibility, a right to intervene?
The War Shifts
Up to the spring of 1968 the war went well for Biafra. Major thrusts by the Nigerian military were repulsed with heavy losses to Nigerian forces. The situation began to change as outside powers sent in arms. Jet fighters and bombers began to arrive from Egypt and Yemen. Mercenaries arrived to train and lead Nigerian units. Most of the financing and arrangements came from Britain, but Nigeria encouraged aid also from the Soviet Union, skillfully playing the two donors off against each other. Meanwhile, France became a major source of arms for Biafra. Biafra too began to hire mercenaries to train and lead army units.In March 1968 the Nigerian forces began a successful assault on Port Harcourt, and by June had completed capture of the seaport and airport. A naval blockade cut off all of the coast, leaving Biafra without any outside access. Suddenly, the war shifted and the famine in Biafra quickly became real starvation.
UNICEF Gears Up
Civil war in Nigeria posed a particular problem for UNICEF. Our regional office responsible for all of Africa south of the Sahara was located in Lagos. The newly appointed regional director was a senior Tanzanian diplomat, Dr. Vedast Kyaruzi. Kyaruzi had previously served as Tanzania’s Permanent Representative at the UN. Like other international agencies and embassies, UNICEF had no field offices and travel of staff to the conflict zones was very restricted. Reports of the extensive ethnic killings came, however, from foreign businessmen who traveled regularly outside Lagos. While most agencies and embassies in Lagos were seen as supporters of one side of or the other of the conflict, Kyaruzi, as a senior African diplomat with experience at the UN was seen as a neutral observer. He had easy access to leaders in the military government, including the head of government, General Gowan, but he also listened carefully to other parties and reported their views to Headquarters.Dick Heyward (then still head of UNICEF programmes - a job Charles Egger would soon assume) and Sasha Bacic (then head of Africa Section) followed Kyaruzi’s reports carefully at Hq. Travelers in the north reported that many northerners blamed the Igbos for the assassination during the first coup of their traditional leader, the Sarduna of Sokoto, and other northern leaders. One report quoted an American businessman with long experience in Nigeria, saying that there is an acceptance “within those who run the government now that large numbers of Igbos must die to placate Northerners for the loss of their spiritual leader...Your own man in Lagos, Dr. Kyaruzi, told me that it is generally agreed that a ceasefire will be possible (only) when, and not before at least one million Igbos have died.” Another report by a Swiss businessman reported letters circulating in the north calling for the killing of every Igbo down to the age of six.
Heyward was deeply troubled by reports of the killings and the impending famine. Others described him as 'passionate' in his concern over the starvation of children there. At the same time he was deeply troubled by the unwillingness of the Secretary-General, UN agencies and the ICRC to respond. The SG, UThant, increasingly took the Nigerian side in the conflict and ordered UN agencies to provide assistance only if they had written agreement of the government in Lagos.
Partnering with ICRC
Like the UN, the ICRC seemed paralyzed by the fact that this was a civil war, rather than the sort of international conflict for which it had been created. Moreover ICRC and the League of Red Cross had very limited capacities for finding and delivering relief aid. Gertrude Lutz had just arrived in Geneva as the new Deputy RD for Europe and N. Africa from her previous post as Representative in Turkey. Heyward assigned Lutz as liaison with ICRC in the hope that she could move them to act on the crisis. Her Swiss nationality and past association with ICRC made her an ideal link. (Charles Egger would later join her in Geneva as UNICEF's chief link with ICRC throughout the Biafran crisis)Meanwhile in Lagos, UNICEF began preparing its relief efforts, but it needed the permission of the military government to deliver aid. In November they received approval for the first relief flight into the affected area, and in December 1967 Sasha Bacic and a representative of the ICRC visited Lagos and in a month of hard negotiating achieved what most international observers thought impossible - an agreement with the government allowing aid to continue entering both sides of the conflict.
Reaching agreement that relief supplies could enter was one thing. Actually getting supplies into the area was another. There were constant obstacles thrown up in Nigeria blocking ships or planes from entering the area. Finally, in April 1968 the government agreed that ICRC could begin a series of 11 flights carrying supplies to both government-held and Biafran-held areas. The supplies mostly consisted of foodstuffs and medicines provided by UNICEF. Not only had the flights been long delayed, but they also delivered only a fraction of the needs in the area, a total of only 105 tons of food for a population of 13.5 million people.
Next week - Frustrated with international diplomacy, UNICEF joins forces with the churches, and the Biafran airlift begins.
Read more articles on UNICEF history


Thank you Tom for the history. I had the privilege of interviewing Labouisse himself on children as zones of peace. He pointed out that he had talked with the Nigerian President seeking his endorsement for UNICEF to work on protecting children on both sides of the conflict. He had stressed that ALL CHILDREN OF NIGERIA WERE HIS CHILDREN. The Nigerian head of state, not wanting to officially declare his agreement, fearing it would be taken as a sign of recognition of the combatants against the government responded: WE WILL NOT SHOOT DOWN A UNICEF PLANE CARRYING RELIEF SUPPLIES TO THE OTHER SIDE. Labouisse said he took this as TACIT agreement and took the courageous step of flying relief supplies to the rebel held areas.
ReplyDeleteI hope while upholding the visionary leadership of James Grant in promoting the concept of children as zones of peace, we will also not forget the "quite dimplomacy" of his predecessor. I am also very pleased that you referred to the activism of Dick Heyward
Baquer Namazi
Thanks Baquer. Glad you enjoyed this first piece in the series on UNICEF's Biafra experience. In fact, I hope to include Harry Labouisse's role in the coming episodes of the story. The exchange between Labouisse and UThant in Geneva when the SG demanded that agencies first obtain written permission from the FMG before sending aid, and then the full month Labouisse spent in Lagos and in visits to frontline areas near Calabar are certainly ones worth recording. You are right in pointing to his quiet but firm approach to diplomacy in Nigeria. If you have a copy of your interview with him, please share it or write up your full recollections of the meeting - these would be of great value to our history collection and to the UNICEF Hq archives. Most of his papers are available only in the Princeton U archives in paper form, and so are not easy to access, so I hope you can write more for the News & Views collection of history articles. Indeed, if we don't write our history, we can be sure that no one else will. Tom
DeleteTom,
ReplyDeleteI much appreciated your pieceon UNICEF response to the situation in Biafra. Hving joined the front office in January 1967, this was my first exposure to one of the great "operations" of the organization. Being competely green and not in the least related to either emergency operation nor Africa, I was merely a small bystander and observor.
I believe that Dick Heyward took the leadership, not because he was head of programme (in fact that Deputy role was occupied by Adelaide Sinclair who was close to retirement to be succeeded by Charles Egger), but because Harry Labouisse was still less than a year in his post and Dick had been serving as acting Executive Director since the passing of Maurice Pate. As your piece clearly portrays, he was sort of the contuing soul of UNICEF.
In your research have you come across the bit part in the Biafra operation played by Marlon Brando?
Thanks again for the great research and writing. Steve
Steve,
DeleteMany thanks for your kind comment. This is exactly the sort of input I was hoping ´those who were there' might add to the dialogue. Please consider writing up your recollections of those early days for our history series. Your mention of Marlon Brando, for instance, would make an interesting piece. Horst Cerni has mentioned his work and I recall the stories of Brando's visit for UNICEF in the Bihar famine. On Biafra I have relied heavily on Dan Jacobs' interviews of Heyward, Orick, and others as well as his superb book on the Biafra conflict, "The Brutality of Nations". Thanks again.
Thanks Tom. Your mention of Dan Jacobs, may help in filling out the role of Marlon Brando, but I am copying this to Horst who either may know the details or might know who does. My spotty memory on this, recalls Dan as a person with media and promotional background who somehow appeared at the time of the Biafra emergency, not as a staff member, but in some sort of consultative role. I sort of recall him being somehow involved in public information and/or fundraising realted to UNICEFs' response to the Biafra situation. Dan and I had a number of informal conversations -- perhaps even a lunch or two together -- as we were two of the very few newcomers to UNICEF at the time. He would disappear on some assignment in reappear in a few weeks. After one of these returns he told me he had spent time at the home of Marlon Brando in California. I seem to recollect that possibillity of UNICEF and Brando somehow working together for Biafra was under consideration. Although a film legend from his work in the 1950s, Brando was at a low point in his career and personal life in dthe mid 60s. I recall Dan indicating that although the star was definitely motivated to help, he seemed to find it difficult to focus, which was why Dan had visited. I am not sure whether he and UNICEF every came together for Biafra. I only recall some mention years later that he had not been considered a appropriate candidates for UNICEF Goodwill Ambassador.
DeleteI sort of think Horst was not yet with UNICEF in 1967, but perhaps if not, he learned some of this history subsequently.
Do take all of what I account above as on somewhat "shaky ground". Best regards, Steve
Thanks Steve - this adds a lot to what I have learned. Horst was in Hq around this time, and I recall his mention of how Henry Labouisse worried about the Nigerians reacting to the name, "Biafra" which a nun had mentioned. They had to cut it out of a film as a result. On Dan Jacobs, if I understand correctly, Heyward brought him on as a spokesperson and media consultant, largely because of his connections in D.C. (he had been Hubert Humphry's speech-writer). He authored several good interviews with various people in UNICEF, and later reused much of that material in his book. You can find a review of Jacob's book, the Brutality of Nations in this NY Times review, "Starvation was the Policy"
Deletehttps://www.nytimes.com/1987/03/29/books/starvation-was-the-policy.html
Similarly, Heyward somehow recruited another person you may have met - George Orick, an American businessman who had worked around various parts of Nigeria for the previous 7 years. Orick said later that he thought Heyward recruited him mainly because he wanted someone who knew Nigeria and he (Heyward) could with as nobody else in Hq seemed to have much knowledge of the area. Orick was later the only member of the UNICEF sponsored visit by Senator Goodell, Dr. Jean Mayer, and Dr. Roy Brown to Biafra in January 1969. Their report was a shocker for Congress. Mayer at the time was head of Nutrition at Harvard and later President of Tufts. Both he and Roy Brown (Tufts and later UCLA) worked at various points as UNICEF consultants.
I have just posted my "A Little History" article for this week - https://xunicefnewsandviews.blogspot.com/2021/08/a-little-history-biafra-unicef-and-sg.html
My mention of Brando in Bihar goes back to a CARE friend, Larry Holtzman, with whom I worked in CARE Bangladesh. Most of the CARE team had been rushed over from India to Bangladesh as soon as the war ended. In the CARE memoirs, Larry wrote,
"One evening I was checking into the government guest house in Bodh Gaya, the place where Buddha found enlightenment, (indeed I was and am also still looking for it) and noticed that the UNICEF representative with whom three of us shared an apartment in Patna, had checked in earlier. I knocked on his door and it was opened by Marlon Brando. The UNICEF representative introduced us and told me the story of Marlon's surprise visit to Bihar. He had received a somewhat garbled cable from his office in Delhi telling him to meet Marlon Brando at the airport. Not knowing who Marlon Brando was, he had him paged after the plane landed and was amazed to find himself face to face with Marlon. There was no room in the hotel, so he took him to our CARE apartment in Patna in Patna for the night. After he left, someone hung a sign over his bed that read, "Marlon Brando slept here." We sat around and drank beer and went through a few plates of snacks. While we were drinking and talking there was a lot of noise in the hallway and we went out to see what was happening. An Italian movie news crew was returning from a day of shooting in the field and they were lugging their equipment down the hall. It was so hot that day that the film had to be kept in dry ice. All of a sudden Marlon stood up straight, looking every bit like the movie star that he was. No one recognized him and so we went back to our beer. I lent the UNICEF guy our jeep as his did not have 4 wheel drive. "
Cheers and regards to both you and Horst.
Hello Tom and Steve,
DeleteI can't shed any light on Marlon Brando's appeals for Biafran relief , but I am sure Jack Ling can. He was closely involved with Marlon.
As you mentioned, Tom, I only worked on a short documentary film about the Biafra situation, cutting out any reverence to Biafra.
On the other hand, Marlon Brando went to Bihar, recorded an 8mm film and was deeply disturbed by the famine there. He experienced the death of a child. I worked with him recording a radio spot for our relief efforts. Marlon also appeared at several gala events in Europe (Helsinki and Paris, for example) where he eloquently spoke of his experiences and the dramatic situation in Bihar and appealed for support of UICEF's effforts..
Your description of the Biafra crisis is fascinating, Tom, and very depressing.
Horst.