Skip to main content

'Shantha Takes on Toyota --Toyota Blinks' by Tom McDermott

It was a pleasant surprise this morning to come across a NY Times article (A Humble 3-Wheel Electric Vehicle Lands Toyota in Federal Court) which mentions a former UNICEF staffer, Shantha Bloemen, We had never crossed paths in our UNICEF lives, or for that matter, in XUNICEF. Her story and the story of the organzation she founded seems intriguing.According to the article, Shantha is a former UNICEF communications officer from western Australia who has taken on a "David vs. Goliath- style" challenge against the giant Toyota. She filed a federal lawsuit last month in Los Angeles alleging the automaker stole electric three-wheeler technology from her Zimbabwean NGO and handed it to a for-profit Kenyan company. The case, filed in U.S. federal court, already appears to have prompted some rethinking at Toyota, whose only public comment so far is that it is "investigating."

Bloemen founded Mobility for Africa to build simple electric vehicles helping farmers — women in particular — get produce to market.

Bloemen spent 21 years in UNICEF communications, with postings in Liberia, Pakistan, India, China, and New York, and a stint running UNICEF's Africa media hub in Johannesburg.


The idea for Mobility for Africa grew out of her early development work in rural Zambia, watching women walk hours of dirt road carrying water, goods, and children, with no support and no alternative. In 2018 she turned that into a Zimbabwe-based social enterprise built around the Hamba, a rugged electric tricycle designed for unpaved roads, with a bench seat for women in skirts and a cargo bed that can carry 400 kilograms. Just 322 Hambas were in use last year, but the organization also built solar-powered charging hubs where farmers swap and recharge batteries — and the income has let customers build houses and keep their children in school.

Toyota Mobility Foundation joined as a partner in 2019, eventually contributing $840,000 — about 18 percent of what Bloemen's organization spent over five years, the rest covered by grants and $300,000 of her own savings. The contract gave Mobility for Africa ownership of its intellectual property and barred Toyota from sharing it with anyone else. According to the lawsuit, filed last month in Los Angeles federal court, that's exactly what happened: the foundation quietly let a California consulting firm, Exa Innovation Studio, set up a for-profit copycat, Songa Mobility, in Kenya — duplicating MFA's technology without credit, while Toyota scrubbed references to Bloemen's group from its own materials and cut its funding.

The suit alleges breach of contract, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and trade secret misappropriation, and seeks damages and an injunction.

Bloemen says, “Women entrepreneurs everywhere get only a fraction of the start-up capital that men do, and in Africa it is harder still, with most impact finance flowing to a handful of markets and a handful of companies, almost all of them led by men, Toyota was happy to learn from our years of work building off-grid rural e-mobility in Zimbabwe. But rather than investing in the African entrepreneurs who built it, they chose to copy, replicate, and control what we created.”

For now, Goliath is keeping its head down: no formal court response yet, just that one word, "investigating" — which reads less like confidence than a company quietly weighing its next move.

Sounds like a story worth following....!

Comments

  1. This is a great story. Kudos to Shantha for tackling such a fundamental issue such as transport in Africa - and all without the backing of a massive international aid machinery.

    ReplyDelete
  2. An interesting and heart-warming story. I wish the Hamba project all the best. I would have expected the NYT to provide a link to the Hamba website. Here it is .

    It reminds me a bit of the Africar story, of the late 1980s. The Africar was made from epoxy-coated wood, which was supposed to be grown from sustainably managed forests. Only three vehicles were built. Also UNICEF was approached for funding.

    Having read about the Hamba and its competitors, I am struck by how heavily the concept is built on the assumption that aid and a continuous flow of donor funding will solve the problem. The project promises to boost integrated development and presents itself as a contribution to achieving a Sustainable Development Goal, employing the familiar language of the aid sector and clearly seeking donor support.

    However, if the objective is to provide rural Africa with access to affordable transport, then the project should be open source. Success should be measured by how widely the Hamba vehicle is produced and sold, regardless of patents or claims of intellectual ownership. One should welcome the vehicle being manufactured and distributed as broadly as possible.

    The women and men of Zimbabwe are not primarily concerned with the SDGs; they want affordable, reliable transport. Achieving scale will require a commercially viable and sustainable enterprise that can produce and sell low-cost transport solutions across African markets.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I knew Shantha in the late 90s when I was with EMOPS in NYHQ. She was hard working and never backed down from a fight and was already doing some freelancing in Zambia during breaks in contract to cover the amazing story of the flow of used clothes from Salvation Army collection points in the US to the most remote markets in Zambia. She is tenacious - so Toyota better look out.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I first met Shantha in graduate school in the late 1990’s and we bound around our South East África past lifes in the 1960’s and 1970’s at the time “Southern Rhodesia” / “Rhodesia” and Mozambique, during the liberation war/civil war and early 1990’s first peace process. Shantha is a wonderful soul and colleague.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Bravo to Shantha! My grandfather, an early electrical engineer, invented the electric fence in the Pampas of Argentina to keep barbed wire from damaging cattle hides. Wealthy and corrupt moguls in NYC invited him to dinner, received a copy of the plans, and sent a person overnight to Washington, DC, with the technical plans before he could get there. He lost his invention. The corrupt men owned it. At the time, there was no legal recourse.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Dear Samantha: I write as a born Southern Rhodesian (a long, long time ago) and we lived on a farm 25 miles outside Bulawayo. To get there, we had to drive on a couple of miles dirt road; then around 12 miles strip roads before we got to the main Victoria Falls to Bulawayo highway which was fully macadamised. Question: Can your very smart three wheelers cope with strip roads ? (For readers unfamiliar with 'strips', they were strips of tarred road leaving the middle as dirt (and usually with potholes). When two vehicles approached each other, they would have to move over putting the right wheels on the left strip, and if there had been a lot of rain, often they would skid off the strips. Exciting !)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @Ken: But only in left-hand drive countries. In other countries the three-or-four-wheeler will have to put their left wheels on the right strip....

      Delete
    2. @Detlef: Would it make a difference if the three wheelers had the single wheel at the back ?

      Delete
    3. @Ken: I would go for a Motorscooter with a sidecar. This would keep the frontwheel on the strip.

      Delete
    4. Yes, Detlef, sidecars were the solution in the Siberian roads during Spring/Summer melting premafrost when I was there at the end of the Soviet Union.

      Delete
  7. Nice story Tom, thanks for sharing.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Amazing story and best wishes to Shantha

    ReplyDelete
  9. What a tremendous courageous story! Congratulations. Hope to read more in the coming month. Boudewijn Mohr


    ReplyDelete
  10. Very interesting and thanks Ken for explaining strip roads! Different places have different problems…

    ReplyDelete
  11. Hi from Tokyo. I only had a good image about Toyota, ( We all relied on Toyota cars in the fields! ) so I’m quite surprised to read this article. I understand that Toyota mobility is not Toyota itself, but it is supposed to enhance good images of Toyota.

    I didn’t recall reading this news in Japanese, so I checked with AI. It seems that this law suit has not been reported by the old media or SNS in Japanese, so most of the Japanese people probably don’t know about this. I guess that at least the editors of foreign news sections must have learned about this law suit because they usually check NY times, especially if it has anything to do with Japan.

    I wonder if no reporting in Japanese language is because of Toyota’s advertisement money to news media or because of the difficulties for the Japanese media to double check the facts with the people involved in Zimbabwe, Kenya and the US.

    I hope that things get sorted out at the court or outside the court. But if it’s get too difficult and if she needs to raise awareness about this in Japan, one of the best ways might be contacting Foreign Correspondent Club in Tokyo. They organize press conferences with interesting speakers. Another possibility is contacting Rehack, an internet media. It recently got a new member, who used to work for TBS, a major TV station to cover emergencies. He might get interested to cover this from multiple angles. Best wishes!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Please ensure you leave your name, bei either selecting your google account (if you have one), or selecting 'name' from the drop down menu. Enter your name there. If confused, leave your name in the text of your comment.